fix(quick-260909-ab3): kollidierende AD-Konten werden angelegt, nur ohne Adresse

- User.email auf optional gestellt (Migration geschrieben, NICHT
  ausgefuehrt); Eindeutigkeitsindex unangetastet, NULL bleibt in Postgres
  je verschieden
- Neuer Kollisionsentscheider (resolveEmailForWrite) in ldap.service.ts:
  eine bereits vergebene Adresse wird nie umgehaengt (T-Q3-01) — das
  zuerst angelegte Konto behaelt sie, jedes weitere Konto entsteht ohne
  Adresse (gesperrte Nutzerentscheidung 2026-09-09, WINDOWS #15)
- Entscheider in upsertMappedUser (Sync) UND importUsersByDn (Handimport)
  verdrahtet, damit der zweite Anlageweg nicht als Luecke bestehen bleibt
- LdapSyncResult um emailConflicts/skippedNoLogin/entryFailures erweitert;
  rohe ORM-Ausnahmetexte gehen nur noch an logger.error, nie in den
  Bericht (T-Q3-02)
- UserService.create nimmt die Adresse optional entgegen; Tender-Digest
  und Instant-Alert ueberspringen Empfaenger ohne Adresse (continue)
- Fuenf neue Testfaelle vorab gegen den unveraenderten Bestand rot
  gelaufen (erwartete Ursachen bestaetigt); 651/651 API-Tests gruen,
  prisma validate und type-check sauber

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FYZcd3SSmo14QTqWx2KKzU

apps/api/prisma/migrations/20260909120000_user_email_optional/migration.sql

@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+-- WINDOWS #15: der AD-Sync liess Konten, deren Adresse bereits einem anderen
+-- Konto gehoert (vier Funktionskonten mit geteilter mail-Adresse gemessen),
+-- wegen der Pflicht auf "User.email" komplett unimportiert liegen -- ohne
+-- verstaendliche Rueckmeldung.
+--
+-- Gesperrte Nutzerentscheidung vom 2026-09-09 (nicht verhandelbar): ein
+-- Konto mit bereits belegter Adresse wird trotzdem angelegt, nur eben OHNE
+-- Adresse. Die Anmeldung laeuft ueber den Benutzernamen, nicht ueber die
+-- Adresse -- das Konto bleibt voll funktionsfaehig, lediglich
+-- Benachrichtigungen per E-Mail erreichen es nicht. Wer eine Adresse zuerst
+-- belegt, behaelt sie unveraendert.
+--
+-- Der Eindeutigkeitsindex auf "email" wird NICHT angefasst: PostgreSQL
+-- behandelt NULL-Werte in einer Eindeutigkeitsregel als jeweils verschieden,
+-- mehrere Konten ohne Adresse sind also weiterhin erlaubt. Bestandszeilen
+-- bleiben unangetastet -- jedes bereits angelegte Konto behaelt seine
+-- heutige Adresse.
+ALTER TABLE "User" ALTER COLUMN "email" DROP NOT NULL;

apps/api/prisma/schema.prisma

@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ enum Role {
 model User {
   id                  String    @id @default(uuid())
   username            String    @unique
-  email               String    @unique
+  email               String?   @unique
   passwordHash        String?
   displayName         String?
   role                Role      @default(USER)

apps/api/src/ldap/ldap.service.spec.ts

@@ -218,6 +218,9 @@ describe('LdapService.syncUsersForTenant — empty base DN no-op', () => {
       groupsRenamed: 0,
       groupsDeleted: 0,
       defaultMarkerMoved: 0,
+      emailConflicts: [],
+      skippedNoLogin: [],
+      entryFailures: [],
       errors: [],
     });
     expect(mockSearch).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
@@ -348,6 +351,9 @@ describe('LdapService — individual user search & import (dedup)', () => {
     prisma = {
       user: {
         findFirst: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(null),
+        // Consulted by importUsersByDn's WINDOWS #15 email-collision decider
+        // whenever an entry carries a mapped `mail` attribute.
+        findUnique: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(null),
         findMany: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue([]),
         update: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({}),
       },
@@ -473,6 +479,172 @@ describe('LdapService — individual user search & import (dedup)', () => {
   });
 });
 
+describe('LdapService.syncUsersForTenant — E-Mail-Kollision bei der Kontoanlage (WINDOWS #15)', () => {
+  let service: LdapService;
+  let prisma: any;
+  let userService: any;
+
+  const cfg = {
+    id: 'cfg1',
+    tenantId: 't1',
+    serverUrl: 'ldap://example',
+    baseDn: 'dc=example,dc=com',
+    searchFilter: '(objectClass=person)',
+    groupFilterDns: [] as string[],
+    userExcludeList: [] as string[],
+    fieldMappings: [
+      { ldapField: 'sAMAccountName', tesseraField: 'username' },
+      { ldapField: 'mail', tesseraField: 'email' },
+    ],
+  };
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    vi.clearAllMocks();
+    mockBind.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
+    mockUnbind.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
+    prisma = {
+      user: {
+        findFirst: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(null),
+        // The collision decider queries this — NOT mocked in the older
+        // describe blocks above, added here because this is the first
+        // block that exercises it (see PLAN.md Task 2 behavior note).
+        findUnique: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(null),
+        findMany: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue([]),
+        update: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({}),
+      },
+      group: { findMany: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue([]) },
+      groupMembership: {
+        createMany: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ count: 0 }),
+        deleteMany: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ count: 0 }),
+      },
+      ldapConfig: { update: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({}) },
+    };
+    userService = { create: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ id: 'created-user' }) };
+    service = new LdapService(prisma, userService, {} as any);
+  });
+
+  it('legt ein Konto mit belegter Adresse trotzdem an, nur ohne Adresse', async () => {
+    mockSearch.mockResolvedValue({
+      searchEntries: [
+        {
+          dn: 'cn=konto1,dc=example,dc=com',
+          sAMAccountName: 'konto1',
+          mail: 'geteilt@example.com',
+        },
+        {
+          dn: 'cn=konto2,dc=example,dc=com',
+          sAMAccountName: 'konto2',
+          mail: 'geteilt@example.com',
+        },
+      ],
+    });
+    // The first entry's address is free (findUnique -> null). By the time
+    // the second entry is processed, the address already belongs to the
+    // first-created account.
+    prisma.user.findUnique
+      .mockResolvedValueOnce(null)
+      .mockResolvedValueOnce({ id: 'konto1-id', email: 'geteilt@example.com' });
+
+    const result = await service.syncUsersForTenant(cfg as any, 't1');
+
+    expect(userService.create).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2);
+    expect(userService.create).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(
+      1,
+      expect.objectContaining({ username: 'konto1', email: 'geteilt@example.com' }),
+    );
+    const secondCallArgs = userService.create.mock.calls[1][0];
+    expect(secondCallArgs.email).toBeUndefined();
+    expect(result.created).toBe(2);
+  });
+
+  it('meldet die Kollision strukturiert und nicht als Fehler', async () => {
+    mockSearch.mockResolvedValue({
+      searchEntries: [
+        {
+          dn: 'cn=konto1,dc=example,dc=com',
+          sAMAccountName: 'konto1',
+          mail: 'geteilt@example.com',
+        },
+        {
+          dn: 'cn=konto2,dc=example,dc=com',
+          sAMAccountName: 'konto2',
+          mail: 'geteilt@example.com',
+        },
+      ],
+    });
+    prisma.user.findUnique
+      .mockResolvedValueOnce(null)
+      .mockResolvedValueOnce({ id: 'konto1-id', email: 'geteilt@example.com' });
+
+    const result = await service.syncUsersForTenant(cfg as any, 't1');
+
+    expect(result.emailConflicts).toEqual([
+      { account: 'konto2', email: 'geteilt@example.com' },
+    ]);
+    expect(result.errors).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  it('nimmt einem bestehenden Konto seine Adresse nicht weg', async () => {
+    mockSearch.mockResolvedValue({
+      searchEntries: [
+        {
+          dn: 'cn=konto3,dc=example,dc=com',
+          sAMAccountName: 'konto3',
+          mail: 'fremd@example.com',
+        },
+      ],
+    });
+    // konto3 already exists locally (matched by ldapDn); the address AD now
+    // reports for it belongs to a THIRD, unrelated user.
+    prisma.user.findFirst.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'konto3-id', email: 'alt@example.com' });
+    prisma.user.findUnique.mockResolvedValue({ id: 'dritter-user-id', email: 'fremd@example.com' });
+
+    const result = await service.syncUsersForTenant(cfg as any, 't1');
+
+    expect(prisma.user.update).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+      expect.objectContaining({
+        where: { id: 'konto3-id' },
+        data: expect.not.objectContaining({ email: expect.anything() }),
+      }),
+    );
+    expect(result.emailConflicts).toEqual([
+      { account: 'konto3', email: 'fremd@example.com' },
+    ]);
+  });
+
+  it('meldet Eintraege ohne Anmeldenamen getrennt und nicht als Fehler', async () => {
+    mockSearch.mockResolvedValue({
+      searchEntries: [{ dn: 'cn=kontakt1,dc=example,dc=com' }],
+    });
+
+    const result = await service.syncUsersForTenant(cfg as any, 't1');
+
+    expect(result.skippedNoLogin).toEqual(['cn=kontakt1,dc=example,dc=com']);
+    expect(result.errors).toEqual([]);
+  });
+
+  it('reicht keinen rohen Datenbanktext an den Bericht durch', async () => {
+    mockSearch.mockResolvedValue({
+      searchEntries: [
+        {
+          dn: 'cn=konto5,dc=example,dc=com',
+          sAMAccountName: 'konto5',
+          mail: 'konto5@example.com',
+        },
+      ],
+    });
+    const ormMessage =
+      'Invalid `prisma.user.create()` invocation: Unique constraint failed on the fields: (`email`)';
+    userService.create.mockRejectedValueOnce(new Error(ormMessage));
+
+    const result = await service.syncUsersForTenant(cfg as any, 't1');
+
+    expect(result.entryFailures).toEqual(['cn=konto5,dc=example,dc=com']);
+    expect(result.errors).not.toContain(ormMessage);
+    expect(JSON.stringify(result)).not.toContain(ormMessage);
+  });
+});
+
 describe('LdapService.testConnection — TLS verification opt-out (ldaps)', () => {
   let service: LdapService;
 

apps/api/src/ldap/ldap.service.ts

@@ -30,9 +30,31 @@ export interface LdapSyncResult {
   groupsRenamed: number;
   groupsDeleted: number;
   defaultMarkerMoved: number;
+  // WINDOWS #15, gesperrte Nutzerentscheidung 2026-09-09: ein AD-Konto,
+  // dessen mail-Adresse bereits einem ANDEREN Konto gehoert, wird trotzdem
+  // angelegt/aktualisiert -- nur eben OHNE diese Adresse. Wer die Adresse
+  // zuerst hatte, behaelt sie unveraendert (T-Q3-01). Diese Liste macht die
+  // Kollision im Bericht sichtbar statt sie still zu verwerfen.
+  emailConflicts: LdapEmailConflict[];
+  // Verzeichniseintraege ohne sAMAccountName (Kontakte, Verteiler,
+  // Ressourcen) -- ein normaler, erwarteter Vorgang, kein Fehler. Traegt die
+  // Kennung (dn) des uebersprungenen Eintrags.
+  skippedNoLogin: string[];
+  // Ein unerwarteter Fehler bei genau diesem Eintrag. Nur die Kennung (dn)
+  // steht hier -- der technische Wortlaut (z. B. eine rohe Prisma/ORM-
+  // Ausnahme) geht AUSSCHLIESSLICH ueber this.logger.error ins
+  // Serverprotokoll und erreicht diesen Bericht nie (T-Q3-02).
+  entryFailures: string[];
   errors: string[];
 }
 
+/** Ein Konto, das wegen einer bereits vergebenen Adresse ohne diese Adresse
+ * angelegt oder aktualisiert wurde (WINDOWS #15). */
+export interface LdapEmailConflict {
+  account: string;
+  email: string;
+}
+
 /**
  * LDAP configuration shape as stored in the database.
  */
@@ -378,6 +400,32 @@ export class LdapService {
     return { username: mappedData['username']?.toLowerCase(), mappedData };
   }
 
+  /**
+   * Decide whether `desiredEmail` may be written to the account identified by
+   * `ownRecordId` (null when the account does not exist yet, i.e. a create).
+   * Queries the unique `email` column via findUnique (deliberately NOT
+   * findFirst — the column is unique, and this keeps the call unambiguously
+   * distinguishable in tests from the identity findFirst lookups in
+   * upsertMappedUser/importUsersByDn) and returns the address only when
+   * nobody holds it yet, or the holder IS this same account. Otherwise the
+   * address is withheld and reported as a collision instead — an address is
+   * NEVER handed from one account to another (T-Q3-01): a directory entry
+   * could otherwise take over a real person's address and receive their
+   * password-reset mail.
+   */
+  private async resolveEmailForWrite(
+    desiredEmail: string,
+    ownRecordId: string | null,
+  ): Promise<{ email?: string; collides: boolean }> {
+    const holder = await this.prisma.user.findUnique({
+      where: { email: desiredEmail },
+    });
+    if (!holder || holder.id === ownRecordId) {
+      return { email: desiredEmail, collides: false };
+    }
+    return { collides: true };
+  }
+
   /**
    * Find-or-upsert one LDAP user by (ldapDn, then username) within a tenant.
    *
@@ -385,13 +433,22 @@ export class LdapService {
    * identity resolution: a user imported one way is NEVER duplicated by the
    * other. A manually-imported user (ldapDn set) is matched by ldapDn on a
    * later department/group sync and updated in place, not re-created.
+   *
+   * WINDOWS #15: an account whose mapped `mail` address is already held by a
+   * DIFFERENT account is still created/updated, just without that address
+   * (locked user decision, 2026-09-09) — see resolveEmailForWrite() above.
+   * The `${username}@ldap.local` fallback for entries with NO mail attribute
+   * at all is untouched: it is not part of this defect.
    */
   private async upsertMappedUser(
     dn: string,
     username: string,
     mappedData: Record<string, string>,
     tenantId: string,
-  ): Promise<'created' | 'updated'> {
+  ): Promise<{
+    status: 'created' | 'updated';
+    emailConflict?: LdapEmailConflict;
+  }> {
     const existingByDn = await this.prisma.user.findFirst({
       where: { ldapDn: dn, tenantId },
     });
@@ -401,30 +458,60 @@ export class LdapService {
     const existing = existingByDn || existingByUsername;
 
     if (existing) {
+      let emailToWrite: string | undefined;
+      let emailConflict: LdapEmailConflict | undefined;
+      if (mappedData['email']) {
+        const decision = await this.resolveEmailForWrite(
+          mappedData['email'],
+          existing.id,
+        );
+        if (decision.collides) {
+          emailConflict = { account: username, email: mappedData['email'] };
+        } else {
+          emailToWrite = decision.email;
+        }
+      }
+
       await this.prisma.user.update({
         where: { id: existing.id },
         data: {
           ...(mappedData['displayName'] && {
             displayName: mappedData['displayName'],
           }),
-          ...(mappedData['email'] && { email: mappedData['email'] }),
+          ...(emailToWrite && { email: emailToWrite }),
           ...(mappedData['username'] && { username }),
           ldapDn: dn,
           isActive: true,
         },
       });
-      return 'updated';
+      return { status: 'updated', emailConflict };
+    }
+
+    let createEmail: string | undefined =
+      mappedData['email'] || `${username}@ldap.local`;
+    let emailConflict: LdapEmailConflict | undefined;
+    if (mappedData['email']) {
+      const decision = await this.resolveEmailForWrite(
+        mappedData['email'],
+        null,
+      );
+      if (decision.collides) {
+        createEmail = undefined;
+        emailConflict = { account: username, email: mappedData['email'] };
+      } else {
+        createEmail = decision.email;
+      }
     }
 
     await this.userService.create({
       username,
-      email: mappedData['email'] || `${username}@ldap.local`,
+      ...(createEmail && { email: createEmail }),
       displayName: mappedData['displayName'],
       role: 'USER',
       tenantId,
       ldapDn: dn,
     });
-    return 'created';
+    return { status: 'created', emailConflict };
   }
 
   /**
@@ -599,9 +686,24 @@ export class LdapService {
             continue;
           }
 
+          // WINDOWS #15: same collision decider as upsertMappedUser — an
+          // address already held by a DIFFERENT account is withheld, never
+          // reassigned (T-Q3-01). No new LdapUserImportResult field: the
+          // account is still created and counted, this manual-import path's
+          // display stays as-is.
+          let createEmail: string | undefined =
+            mappedData['email'] || `${username}@ldap.local`;
+          if (mappedData['email']) {
+            const decision = await this.resolveEmailForWrite(
+              mappedData['email'],
+              null,
+            );
+            createEmail = decision.collides ? undefined : decision.email;
+          }
+
           await this.userService.create({
             username,
-            email: mappedData['email'] || `${username}@ldap.local`,
+            ...(createEmail && { email: createEmail }),
             displayName: mappedData['displayName'],
             role: 'USER',
             tenantId,
@@ -775,6 +877,9 @@ export class LdapService {
       groupsRenamed: 0,
       groupsDeleted: 0,
       defaultMarkerMoved: 0,
+      emailConflicts: [],
+      skippedNoLogin: [],
+      entryFailures: [],
       errors: [],
     };
 
@@ -858,15 +963,15 @@ export class LdapService {
           syncedDns.push(dn);
 
           if (!username) {
-            result.errors.push(
-              `Entry ${dn}: no username mapped (check sAMAccountName mapping)`,
-            );
+            // Normal for contacts/resources/distribution entries without a
+            // sAMAccountName — a neutral hint, not an error (WINDOWS #15).
+            result.skippedNoLogin.push(dn);
             continue;
           }
 
           // Find-or-upsert by (ldapDn, then username) via the shared helper so
           // sync and manual import dedupe identically (never a duplicate row).
-          const status = await this.upsertMappedUser(
+          const { status, emailConflict } = await this.upsertMappedUser(
             dn,
             username,
             mappedData,
@@ -877,12 +982,20 @@ export class LdapService {
           } else {
             result.updated++;
           }
+          if (emailConflict) {
+            result.emailConflicts.push(emailConflict);
+          }
         } catch (entryError: unknown) {
           const msg =
             entryError instanceof Error
               ? entryError.message
               : 'Unknown error processing entry';
-          result.errors.push(`Entry ${entry.dn}: ${msg}`);
+          // T-Q3-02: the raw exception text (ORM table/column/call names)
+          // goes to the server log only — never to the report an
+          // administrator reads. Only the entry's identifier (dn) is
+          // reported.
+          this.logger.error(`LDAP sync entry ${entry.dn} failed: ${msg}`);
+          result.entryFailures.push(entry.dn);
         }
       }
 

apps/api/src/tenders/tender-digest.scheduler.ts

@@ -134,7 +134,10 @@ export class TenderDigestScheduler implements OnModuleInit {
         if (!matches.length) continue;
 
         const user = await this.prisma.user.findUnique({ where: { id: userId } });
-        if (!user) continue;
+        // Kein Konto, oder ein Konto ohne Adresse (WINDOWS #15, kollidierte
+        // AD-Adresse) -- die Zugehoerigkeit funktioniert, nur der
+        // Mailversand wird uebersprungen (zugesagtes Verhalten).
+        if (!user || !user.email) continue;
 
         const sections = groupMatchesByProfile(matches);
         const sent = await this.mail.sendDigest({ email: user.email }, user.tenantId, sections);

apps/api/src/tenders/tender-matching.service.ts

@@ -125,7 +125,10 @@ export class TenderMatchingService {
         if (!fresh.length) continue; // nothing new for this profile this tick
 
         const user = await this.prisma.user.findUnique({ where: { id: profile.userId } });
-        if (!user) continue;
+        // Kein Konto, oder ein Konto ohne Adresse (WINDOWS #15, kollidierte
+        // AD-Adresse) -- die Zugehoerigkeit funktioniert, nur der
+        // Mailversand wird uebersprungen (zugesagtes Verhalten).
+        if (!user || !user.email) continue;
 
         const sent = await this.mail.sendInstant(
           { email: user.email },

apps/api/src/user/user.service.ts

@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ export class UserService {
    */
   async create(data: {
     username: string;
-    email: string;
+    email?: string;
     password?: string;
     displayName?: string;
     role?: 'SUPER_ADMIN' | 'ADMIN' | 'USER';