Files
tessera-ctl/.planning/quick/260911-mkj-windows-27-schliessen-relations-blindste/260911-mkj-VERIFICATION.md
T
schalli 8829999e70
Tessera CI/CD / Lint & Type Check (push) Successful in 45s
Tessera CI/CD / Tests (push) Successful in 53s
Tessera CI/CD / Build & Publish Images (push) Successful in 28s
docs(quick-260911-mkj): WINDOWS #27 geschlossen und verifiziert
2026-09-11 16:57:57 +02:00

83 lines
9.6 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
---
phase: quick-260911-mkj
verified: 2026-09-11T16:56:00Z
status: passed
score: 6/6 must-haves verified
covered_files: [".planning/WINDOWS.md", ".planning/quick/260911-mkj-windows-27-schliessen-relations-blindste/260911-mkj-PLAN.md", ".planning/quick/260911-mkj-windows-27-schliessen-relations-blindste/260911-mkj-SUMMARY.md", "apps/api/src/prisma/rls-access-inventory.spec.ts", "docs/mandantentrennung-etappe2-fehlerrichtung.md", "docs/mandantentrennung-zugriffsklassifikation.md"]
covered_digest: "v1:sha256:d22ed49a10962fbdcd4ce1b6d931c9f4bf40f3caab84bb2af3b05b80fddba855"
behavior_unverified: 0
overrides_applied: 0
---
# Quick Task quick-260911-mkj: WINDOWS #27 schliessen — Relations-Blindstelle Verification Report
**Task Goal:** Vierte Erkennungsform in `rls-access-inventory.spec.ts` fuer Relationszugriffe (`include:`/`select:`/`_count:`) hinzufuegen, Bestandsaufnahme fortschreiben, WINDOWS #27 schliessen, Restmenge als eigener Ledger-Eintrag fuehren.
**Verified:** 2026-09-11T16:56:00Z
**Status:** passed
**Commits reviewed:** 5ad23d0, 388690f (base cc26197)
## Goal Achievement
### Observable Truths
| # | Truth | Status | Evidence |
|---|-------|--------|----------|
| 1 | Der Detektor kann nicht still unterberichten (Waechter faellt laut, nicht `\|\| echo 0`) | ✓ VERIFIED | Falsified live: added `someClient.tenant.findMany({ include: { users: true } })` on an unknown receiver in a throwaway file (`apps/api/src/tmp-verify-probe/tmp-probe.service.ts`) → named test `jede include:/select:/_count:-Angabe liegt innerhalb eines erkannten Modellaufrufs...` went red (`1 failed \| 23 passed`). Also injected `select: IMPORTED_SELECT_XYZ` (unresolved identifier) in a second throwaway file → `unresolvedRelationSpecValues ist ueberall leer` went red (`2 failed \| 22 passed`). Both probes removed; suite restored to 24/24 green; `git status --short` clean before/after. |
| 2 | Acht gepinnte Proben, darunter WINDOWS #27 ungebunden UND gebunden | ✓ VERIFIED | `rls-access-inventory.spec.ts:773-913`: Probe A (`this.prisma.tenant` → `unboundModels ⊇ {tenant, user}`), Probe B (same on `forTenant(` client → `boundModels ⊇ {tenant, user}`), plus real ldap form, nested `where` chain, scalar-select negative probe, `_count: true`, unknown receiver, constant resolution/unresolved — all 8 present and passing. |
| 3 | 7 new pairs + 3 Stand-changes are in the classification doc with class/Stand/reason; `ldapFieldMapping` reads `beides`/`gemischt` | ✓ VERIFIED | All 10 required table rows found verbatim in `docs/mandantentrennung-zugriffsklassifikation.md`. Recomputed class distribution independently from the table: `muss-mandantengebunden 35, keine-mandantengebundene-tabelle 21, beides 14, bewusst-uebergreifend 2` = 72, matching the claimed 35/21/14/2. `ldapFieldMapping` row (line 597) carries reason text referencing `getAllActiveConfigs()`/`include: { fieldMappings: true }`. |
| 4 | Ledger #33 exists, is open, names both zero-coverage files, not folded into #27 | ✓ VERIFIED | `.planning/WINDOWS.md` line 50: `\| 33 \| quick-260911-mkj \| unmet-truth \|...` status `open`, description names both `tenders/tenders.seed.ts` and `tenders/backfill-tender-source.ts`. Line 44: `#27` status `fixed`. Header counters (`open_count: 14`, `total_count: 33`) match table row counts exactly (33 rows, 14 open). |
| 5 | Documented drift (926359b) is pre-existing, not caused by this execution | ✓ VERIFIED | `926359b` (docs-only: `.planning/HANDOFF.json`, `docs/mandantentrennung-etappe3-auftrag.md`) is an ancestor of `5ad23d0`. `git diff 926359b -- docs/mandantentrennung-etappe3-auftrag.md .planning/HANDOFF.json` against current HEAD is empty — neither executor commit touched these files further. The allow-list gate (`git diff --name-only cc26197`) does flag `docs/mandantentrennung-etappe3-auftrag.md` as unexpected, exactly as SUMMARY documents. |
| 6 | Constraints held: no schema/migration/compose/env change, switch off, no service code converted | ✓ VERIFIED | `git diff --name-only cc26197 -- apps/api/prisma` empty. `git diff --name-only cc26197 \| grep -E '^(docker-compose\|apps/api/\.env\|\.env)'` empty. Only file changed under `apps/api/src` is the spec (`apps/api/src/prisma/rls-access-inventory.spec.ts`) — confirmed by grep. |
**Score:** 6/6 truths verified (0 present-behavior-unverified)
### Required Artifacts
| Artifact | Expected | Status | Details |
|----------|----------|--------|---------|
| `apps/api/src/prisma/rls-access-inventory.spec.ts` | `analyzeSource`, `parseSchemaRelations`, `SCHEMA_RELATIONS`, 4th form, `RELATION_SPEC_EXCEPTIONS`, 3 watchdogs, 2 schema tests, 8 pinned probes | ✓ VERIFIED | All present (lines 209-360 for schema parsing/4th-form, 754-913 for describe block); 24 `it(` total, 24/24 green. |
| `docs/mandantentrennung-zugriffsklassifikation.md` | 7 new rows, 3 revised Stand, rewritten gap paragraph, dated overview paragraph, `Stand 260911-mkj` paragraph + new class-distribution table, background-service nachtrag | ✓ VERIFIED | All present and recomputed to match (see truth 3 evidence). Heading stays "sechs Fälle" (no phantom new case). |
| `docs/mandantentrennung-etappe2-fehlerrichtung.md` | `Nachtrag (260911-mkj)` under `(n4)`, note under `## Etappe 2 — Abschluss` | ✓ VERIFIED | Line 2474 `Nachtrag (260911-mkj)` inside `(n4)` block; `## Etappe 2 — Abschluss` section references `#27 ... seit 260911-mkj geschlossen`. |
| `.planning/WINDOWS.md` | #27 `fixed`, new entry `quick-260911-mkj` for out-of-form receivers | ✓ VERIFIED | See truth 4. |
### Key Link Verification
| From | To | Via | Status | Details |
|------|----|----|--------|---------|
| `analyzeSource()` fourth form | `SCHEMA_RELATIONS` → `boundModels`/`unboundModels` | direct write, same client-name-lowercasing as doc's `Modell` column | ✓ WIRED | `scanRelationKeys()` (lines 303-360) writes directly into the same sets consumed by `findAccessSites`/`computeStandByKey`, which the pre-existing comparison tests (`jede im Quelltext gefundene (Datei, Modell)-Fundstelle ist im Dokument eingetragen`, `der eingetragene Stand stimmt`) already exercise — confirmed green. |
| Raw count vs. matched count | `RELATION_SPEC_EXCEPTIONS` | watchdog test | ✓ WIRED | Falsified live (see truth 1). |
### Behavioral Spot-Checks
| Behavior | Command | Result | Status |
|----------|---------|--------|--------|
| Detector red on out-of-form unbound `include:` | inject throwaway file, run spec | `1 failed \| 23 passed` | ✓ PASS |
| Detector red on unresolved constant identifier | inject throwaway file, run spec | `2 failed \| 22 passed` (cumulative) | ✓ PASS |
| Spec green after cleanup | `npm --prefix apps/api run test -- src/prisma/rls-access-inventory.spec.ts` | 24/24 passed | ✓ PASS |
| Full suite baseline | `npm --prefix apps/api run test` | 1007/1007 tests, 62/62 files | ✓ PASS (matches orchestrator's pre-measured baseline exactly) |
| Type-check | `npm --prefix apps/api run type-check` | exit 0, no output | ✓ PASS |
| Allow-list diff against `cc26197` | `git diff --name-only cc26197` | only spec + 2 docs + `.planning/**` (plus pre-existing, untouched `docs/mandantentrennung-etappe3-auftrag.md` drift) | ✓ PASS (as documented) |
### Anti-Patterns Found
| File | Line | Pattern | Severity | Impact |
|------|------|---------|----------|--------|
| `apps/api/src/prisma/rls-access-inventory.spec.ts` | 203-207 | Code comment claims the `(?=\s\|$)` lookahead in `parseSchemaRelations`'s field pattern is necessary to avoid losing list relations (`User[]` at line end) — reverting it (`(?:\[\]\|\?)?` kept, trailing lookahead removed) was tried live against the current `schema.prisma` and against the pinned `Tenant.users -> User` test; **no test went red**, and `SCHEMA_RELATIONS` still resolved identically (34 relation fields, same set) with or without the lookahead. | ℹ️ Info | Does not indicate an actual under-reporting risk today — `\w+` already stops before `[`/`?`, so the guard is currently redundant for this schema. It does mean the specific historical-bug narrative in the comment is not backed by a dedicated regression test; a future schema/regex change that reintroduces the described failure mode would not be caught by any existing assertion. Not a blocker: the primary anti-under-report protections (raw-vs-matched watchdog, unresolved-value watchdog) were independently falsified and confirmed live (see truth 1). Reverted cleanly, `git status --short` confirmed clean before continuing. |
### Requirements Coverage
Quick task — no formal `.planning/REQUIREMENTS.md` entries exist for `WINDOWS-27`/`ETAPPE-4-VORAUSSETZUNG` (expected; quick tasks declare requirements inline in PLAN frontmatter, not the milestone requirements ledger). Both requirement IDs are addressed by the verified truths above.
### Human Verification Required
None. This phase is entirely static analysis (a Vitest spec) and Markdown documentation — no UI, no runtime service behavior, no external integration. All claims were verifiable by direct command execution and falsification.
### Gaps Summary
None. All six derived must-haves (detector cannot silently under-report; eight pinned probes including both #27 forms; seven new pairs / three Stand changes / ldapFieldMapping reclass; Ledger #33 open and correctly scoped; documented pre-existing drift; constraints held) are verified against the actual codebase, not just against SUMMARY.md's narrative. The one ℹ️ Info finding (lookahead-revert falsification produced no red test) is a documentation/robustness nuance, not a functional gap — the detector's actual anti-under-report mechanism (the raw/matched watchdog) was independently and successfully falsified.
---
_Verified: 2026-09-11T16:56:00Z_
_Verifier: Claude (gsd-verifier)_